Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Tuesday December 2, 2008

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

Brookings Institution/Princeton University Briefing

Political Parties and Partisanship: A Look at the American Electorate

U.S. Politics, Politics, Elections


Event Summary

With less than two months remaining before Election Day, the American electorate remains deeply divided by party. Partisan attachments appear increasingly to shape voters' perceptions of economic and social reality as well as their preferences regarding candidates and issues.

Event Information

When

Friday, September 17, 2004
10:00 AM to 11:30 AM

Where

Falk Auditorium
Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
Map

Event Materials

Contact: Office of Communications

E-mail: communications@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

To assess this highly polarized political climate, the Brookings Institution's Governance Studies Program and the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs will hold the first of five roundtable discussions that will take place this fall in connection with the 2004 election campaign.

Panelists will discuss the current state of partisan attachments in the American electorate, how these attachments develop and change, and how they shape political attitudes and perceptions. In addition, panelists will also assess how partisanship affects voting behavior and whether or not "swing voters" and competitive districts are disappearing from the American political landscape.

Transcript

THOMAS E. MANN: Now, you might have noticed that Washington tends to react excessively to each new poll or candidate miscue. The discussion of the American elections often times dwells on inside baseball and swings widely in response to new bits of information. We have just gone through one of those cycles, starting with the Republican Convention. A few early media polls shaped the coverage and led to an outpouring of advice from Democrats outside the campaign as to what the Kerry campaign needed to do to resurrect a candidacy on its deathbed.

Today's Washington Post found it newsworthy to put on page one a gossipy story about who is up and who is down in the campaign itself, while the story on Kerry's speech to the National Guard, the sharpest and most coherent statement in a two-month period lacking in coherent statements on Iraq, managed A20. Let the record show that John Harwood's Wall Street Journal had that as its lead item on page one.

Now, we had a series of four or, I think, five national polls that basically show the race returning to a dead heat, a plus or minus one percent lead, depending on whether one is looking at registered or likely voters. Therefore, I was getting ready to be treated to insightful analyses of how Kerry had turned around his campaign in the past week, but, alas, Gallup released a poll late yesterday showing a 14-point Bush lead in the field at the same time as Andy Kohut's Pew study. Andy, the former president of Gallup, used Princeton Survey Research. He found that the first three days in the field showed that large Bush lead and the next three days showed the race at parity.

Read the complete event transcript (PDF—120KB)

Participants

Moderators

Thomas E. Mann

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Panelists

Alan Abramowitz

Alben W. Barkley Professor of Political Science, Emory University

Donald Green

A. Whitney Griswold Professor of Political Science, and Director of the Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.

John Harwood

Political Editor, Wall Street Journal

Larry M. Bartels

Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now