Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Saturday November 21, 2009

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in


Event Summary

A year ago, the United States and its allies invaded Iraq with the stated objectives of destroying Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, removing Saddam Hussein from power, clamping down on global terrorism, and fostering democracy in a troubled region.

Event Information

When

Wednesday, March 10, 2004
2:00 PM to 3:30 PM

Where

Falk Auditorium
Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
Map

Contact: Office of Communications

E-mail: communications@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

Although the military operation was swift and successful, the long-term implications are less clear. Debate has focused on the failure to find weapons of mass destruction, continuing security problems and the political future of Iraq. While relations with allies and the UN have improved, there are on-going questions about the Bush Administration's long-term strategy for the Middle East.

At this press briefing, a panel of Brookings experts on Iraq and the Middle East will look back on the lessons learned from the United States year-long involvement in Iraq and discuss the ongoing diplomatic and military challenges.

Transcript

KENNETH POLLACK: I thought that I would touch on three different aspects of the war, all of which have potential ramifications for moving forward, also nice at this point to look back on them. I thought I would talk about the intelligence issue a little bit, talk about Iraq itself, and then also talk a little bit about the impact of the war on some of the other regional governments, try hard not to talk too much about that because that's going to be where Shibley is going to focus I think most of his efforts. I'll take a slightly different tack.

With regard to the intelligence issue, you know, a lot of you have heard me on this issue. For those of you who've read the Atlantic piece, you've gotten probably the fullest exposition of my feeling about that.

I've done any number of TV and radio and print interviews since then which give you, unfortunately, only little snippets and take the chunk that they like.

For me, the intelligence issue is a very complicated one. It's also an extremely important one. I think that we have a real problem as a result of the intelligence failures on Iraq, and my concern is this. I don't think that the rest of the world in terms of their governments disbelieves the United States and will simply disregard whatever intelligence the United States comes forward with at future dates.

I think that's a concern that a lot of people have. My own sense, both in talking to foreign officials, talking to U.S. officials is that, you know, the foreign governments, by and large, understand what happened, and they are still willing to work with us on the basis of our intelligence, recognizing that our intelligence is never perfect and that there are always issues with all intelligence.

Read the complete event transcript. (PDF—223KB)

Participants

Moderators

James B. Steinberg

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy

Panelists

Kenneth M. Pollack

Director of Research , Saban Center for Middle East Policy

Michael E. O'Hanlon

Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy

Philip H. Gordon

Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy

Shibley Telhami

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy, Saban Center for Middle East Policy


My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now