Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Friday September 5, 2008

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

An Economic Studies and Budgeting for National Priorities Event

Restoring Fiscal Sanity: How to Balance the Budget

Taxes, Defense, Budget Deficit, U.S. Economy, Federal Budget

Event Summary

America will face persistent, annual deficits of over half a trillion dollars over the next decade. If current policies continue, these deficits will slow economic growth, reduce household incomes, and impose enormous burdens on the next generation. To address the problem, a team of Brookings experts—several of whom have served as White House Office of Management and Budget directors—has been working on possible solutions.

Event Information

When

Tuesday, January 13, 2004
3:30 PM to 5:30 PM

Where

Falk Auditorium
Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
Map

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

On January 13, the group will release a new report on why deficits matter and what might be done about them. The report, which is being released three weeks before the president's budget is due to Congress, provides a clear-eyed assessment of the federal budget outlook for the next ten years and offers three ways to balance the budget.

Along with brief presentations by the Brookings authors, an independent, expert panel will address the budget problem and the report's proposals.

Introduction:
STROBE TALBOTT
President, The Brookings Institution

Panel 1:

ALICE M. RIVLIN
Senior Fellow and Director
Greater Washington Research Program, Brookings

ISABEL V. SAWHILL
Vice President and Director
Economic Studies Program, Brookings

Panel 2:

DAN L. CRIPPEN
Former Director
Congressional Budget Office

ROBERT E. RUBIN
Director and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Citigroup

JOHN EDWARD PORTER
Partner, Hogan & Hartson, LLP

ROBERT D. REISCHAUER
President, Urban Institute

Panel 3:

Moderator:
HENRY J. AARON
Senior Fellow
Economic Studies, The Bruce and Virginia MacLaury Chair, Brookings

LAEL BRAINARD
Senior Fellow
Economic and Foreign Policy Studies, Brookings

WILLIAM G. GALE
Senior Fellow and Deputy Director, Economic Studies
Brookings; Co-Director, Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center

RON HASKINS
Senior Fellow
Economic Studies, Brookings

PETER R. ORSZAG
Joseph A. Pechman Senior Fellow
Economic Studies, Brookings

CHARLES L. SCHULTZE
Senior Fellow Emeritus
Economic Studies, Brookings

Transcript

ALICE RIVLIN: This book is about how to balance the budget. We think its significance in the current fiscal debate is that it actually tries to answer the question: If you wanted to balance the budget in 10 years, how could you do it? What specific spending cuts and/or revenue increases would have to be enacted to eliminate the deficit by 2014?

Now, we don't expect everybody to buy our particular answers. Indeed, we'd be delighted if this book sparked a vigorous debate and lots of counterproposals. Our hope is to move the discussion from should we try to balance the budget to how should we balance the budget.

We actually have three plans for eliminating the deficit over the next decade. Before Bell tells you a little bit about them, I'm going to talk about how we see the budget outlook, why think getting to balance is important and what we mean by it.

First, the deficit outlook. The deficit for the current year is now expected to be, in Secretary Snow's words, in the range of $500 billion. That's about 4.4 percent of GDP. None of us is worried about the consequences for the economy of a large budget deficit this year. The economy is recovering, but labor markets are still very soft, and inflation is nonexistent.

ISABEL V. SAWHILL: Well, I hope Alice has convinced you that this is a very serious problem, and my job now is to talk about how we might deal with it. And as she's told you, we talk in this book about three different plans:

The first one we call the smaller government plan. It relies primarily on spending cuts to get to balance in 2014;

The second we call the larger government plan, and it relies almost exclusively on higher revenues to get to balance in the same year;

And the final we call the better government plan. It keeps government about the same size as it is now as a share of the economy, but it reallocates spending in ways that the authors of this book think would make a government more effective and, thus, a better government.

Read the full event transcript:
· Introduction and Panel 1 (PDF—31KB)

· Panel 2 with Q&A (PDF—101KB)

· Panel 3 with Q&A (PDF—78KB)

My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now