Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Friday September 5, 2008

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Discussion Co-sponsored by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life and the Brookings Foreign Policy and Governance Studies Programs

Religion and American Foreign Policy: Prophetic, Perilous, Inevitable

Religion

Event Summary

No one can now doubt the power of religion in international affairs. Can religious convictions guide a moral foreign policy? Do they lead to fanaticism? Do they promote an unrealistic view of the world? Yet religious motivations are also behind movements on behalf of human rights, democratization, debt relief, and assistance to poor countries. The theory of just war also owes a great debt to theology.

Event Information

When

Wednesday, February 05, 2003
10:00 AM to 12:00 PM

Where

Falk Auditorium
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20036
Map

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

How do religious or moral traditions help us define what sort of intervention—military and non-military (e.g., foreign aid, economic sanctions)—is required, and to what purpose? What are the moral traditions from which we should draw in order to understand America's obligations? How do groups with different moral traditions influence the formation of U.S. foreign policy?

Join us for a discussion of the role of religion and ethics in American foreign policy.

Moderator:
E.J. DIONNE JR.
Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, The Brookings Institution; Columnist, Washington Post; Co-chair, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life

Presenters:
FR. BRYAN HEHIR
President, Catholic Charities, USA; Distinguished Professor of Ethics and International Affairs, School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University

MICHAEL WALZER
Professor, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ; Author, Just and Unjust Wars and Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality

Respondents:
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
Columnist, Washington Post

JAMES M. LINDSAY
Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Studies, The Brookings Institution; Co-author, Defending America: The Case for Limited National Missile Defense

LOUISE RICHARDSON
Executive Dean, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; Author, When Allies Differ: Anglo-American Relations in the Suez and Falkland Crises

Transcript

E.J. DIONNE, JR.: Welcome to "Religion and American Foreign Policy: Prophetic, Perilous, Inevitable." We are very glad you could join us for this discussion today. The event is co-sponsored by The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and The Brookings Foreign Policy and Governance Studies Programs.

I want to mention first that we are sorry to be missing today two people from the Pew Forum. My co-chair, Jean Bethke Elshtain, whom many of you know and is a friend of many on our panel here, had some teaching responsibilities, and Melissa Rogers, the executive director of the Forum, had to attend a family funeral.

It's customary for someone to begin by saying what a pleasure it is to welcome a panel. In my case, it is no exaggeration to say that it's an enormous honor to welcome this panel. I don't think we have seen a group of this quality since Reinhold Niebuhr, John Courtney Murray, Irving Howe and Isaiah Berlin got together, and I'm not sure that meeting ever actually happened. I would like to have been there, though.

As are so many others here, I am personally indebted to Father Bryan Hehir and Michael Walzer for being such brilliant writers and teachers and, it's not an exaggeration to say, such moral guides. They know the difference between morality and moralism. So much of what I think that is sensible has been inspired by them in some way; and I should say that the errors and the stupidity in what I think are all my fault.

They and our entire panel, I think, embody what Walzer wrote in The Company of Critics about the connected critic: "Glory doesn't belong only to the critical equivalent of the epic or tragic poet. If the critic is to speak for his fellows, he must also speak with them. And when what he says sounds unpatriotic, he has to insist upon his own deeper patriotism." I think today we have a panel of patriots. I say that also for Walter Burns's benefit, who has written so thoughtfully on that subject.

The complete transcript is available in PDF form (PDF—104KB)

My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now