Quality. Independence. Impact.

Home | Contact Us | Media Resources

Friday September 5, 2008

Welcome   |   Register   |   Log in

Past Event

A Brookings Institution - Woodrow Wilson School Partnership

Antipoverty Policies: Incentives and Work Mandates for Young Men

U.S. Poverty, Welfare

Event Summary

Although the nation is no longer achieving major reductions in poverty as it did during the 1960s, some gains have been made in recent years, especially among single mothers. But more progress is needed in focusing antipoverty efforts on men. Many of the nation's most vexing domestic problems are linked with negative behaviors of adolescent boys and young men. Delinquency and crime, school dropout, unemployment and nonwork, nonmarital births, and poverty are all associated disproportionately with young men.

There is every reason to believe that further progress is possible. At this event, a slate of panelists, including researchers, and practitioners, discussed two sets of public policies – wage subsidies and work requirements – that hold promise for helping young men increase their employment and earnings and thereby reduce poverty and its associated social problems. This event also marked the release of the latest volume of The Future of Children journal, "The Next Generation of Antipoverty Policies," published by Brookings and Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School.

Event Information

When

Thursday, September 20, 2007
9:00 AM to 11:00 AM

Where

Ballroom A
Jurys Doyle Hotel
1500 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Map

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

E-mail: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

 

Transcript

RON HASKINS : The reason that we're focusing on poverty -- there are several reasons, but here is a very good one, namely, that poverty has been very stubborn. We essentially have not reduced poverty since the early 1970s. Now, there're some exceptions. We've reduced poverty for the elderly quite a bit, and it's a very straightforward explanation: We gave them money. That's one way to reduce poverty. And we did it through Social Security. Biggest advance in Social Security benefits so poverty among the elderly declined, and whereas throughout human history poverty among the elderly has been the highest poverty rate today in the United States, it's much lower than that for children, for example.

And the second example of where we've had some success was among single female-headed families, because so many mothers went to work during the 1990s, the second part of the 1990s when we had quite a substantial decline in poverty among female-headed families.

But still our poverty rate, as you can see, has not really gone down much, and so we really need to focus on poverty, and that's what we're doing with this volume. And, in fact, the charge we gave all the authors was to propose a single way to reduce poverty, to defend it, and to tell us how much it would cost.

Participants

Moderator

Isabel V. Sawhill

Senior Fellow, Economic Studies

Ron Haskins

Senior Fellow, Economic Studies

Panelists

David Blankenhorn

Founder and President, Institute for American Values

Gordon Berlin

President, MDRC

Harry J. Holzer

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Metropolitan Policy Program

Hugh B. Price

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Economic Studies

Larry Mead

Professor of Politics, New York University

Mindy Tarlow

Executive Director and C.E.O., Center for Employment Opportunities

Richard Claytor

Director of Fatherhood Initiatives, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, Child Support Division

Robert Doar

Commissioner, New York City Human Resources Administration

My Portfolio

My New Content

View suggested content based on items you have saved to your Portfolio.
Log in or register now